Resumen
El presente artículo analiza la representación de los personajes femeninos subalternos en una influyente adaptación teatral húngara de Macbeth, de Shakespeare, realizada en 2018 y dirigida por Rémusz Szikszai en el Teatro Jászai Mari de Tatabánya y el Teatro Szkéné de Budapest, Hungría. El artículo se centra en la representación de las mujeres, analizando más detenidamente la interpretación de Lady Macbeth y dos de las hermanas fatídicas (la tercera hermana es un papel masculino en la producción). En el contexto teórico de la subalternidad y la justicia social, el estudio examinará si la producción desafía o confirma las representaciones tradicionales de los personajes femeninos. La producción se utilizará como estudio de caso para investigar los mecanismos a través de los cuales la mujer subalterna puede alcanzar agentividad y representación. Se demostrará cómo la representación de las mujeres en la adaptación traspasa casi todas las fronteras imaginables, incluyendo la división entre animal/humano, hombre/mujer, vivo/muerto y natural/sobrenatural. La puesta en escena indica, quizás de forma involuntaria, que las mujeres solo pueden empoderarse si están dispuestas a traspasar estas fronteras. Sin embargo, si se analiza más detenidamente, los personajes femeninos de la adaptación quedan relegados a los tropos patriarcales establecidos, dado que se pueden clasificar claramente como monjas, prostitutas, madres, esposas, brujas o locas. Aunque en la producción están bien representadas muchas capas de subalternidad (incluidas las raciales, políticas y culturales), la dimensión de género sigue sin explorarse suficientemente.
Citas
ALMÁSI, Zsolt. 2018. “Macbeth fojtogató és bizonytalan világa. A Macbeth Tatabányán Szikszai Rémusz rendezésében” [Macbeth’s Suffocating and Insecure World: Macbeth at Tatabánya directed by Rémusz Szikszai] (Theatre review). Prae. December 26. https://www.prae.hu/article/10760-macbeth-fojtogato-es-bizonytalan-vilaga/ (Last access: July 29, 2025).
––––. 2021. “Textuality, Heritage, and Identity in Hungary: Contexts for the Interpretation of Szikszai’s Insertion in Macbeth (2018).” In Shakespeare in Central Europe after 1989: Common Heritage and Regional Identity, ed. Zsolt Almási and Kinga Földváry. Theatralia 24: 222–38.
BEREMÉNYI, Géza and Tamás Cseh. 1997. Képek dala. [Song of images]. https://csehtamasarchivum.hu/lemezgyujtemeny-track/kepek-dala (Last access: July 29, 2025).
BLADEN, Victoria, Sarah Hatchuel and Nathalie Vienne-Guerrin. 2019. Shakespeare on Screen: King Lear. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
BOOSE, Linda E. 1991. “Scolding Brides and Bridling Scolds: Taming the Woman’s Unruly Member.” Shakespeare Quarterly 42 (2): 179–213. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2870547 (Last access: July 29, 2025).
BRAUNMULLER, Albert R. 1997. Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
CSEH, Andrea Izabella. 2017. “A félvér herceg [The half-blood prince]. Interview with Nagypál Gábor.” Criticai Lapok, November. https://www.criticailapok.hu/archivum/2-uncategorised/39201-a-félvér-herceg (Last access: July 29, 2025).
DEEPL Translator. https://www.deepl.com/translator (Last access: July 29, 2025).
GOLDIE, Terry and Zubin Meer. 2004. “Is There a Subaltern in This Class(room)?” In Home-Work: Postcolonialism, Pedagogy, and Canadian Literature, ed. Cynthia Sugars. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. 213–28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ckpc18.15 (Last access: July 29, 2025).
GUHA, Ranajit. 1982. “Preface.” In Subaltern Studies 1: Writings on South Asian History and Society, ed. Ranajit Guha. Oxford: Oxford UP, vii–viii.
HARGITAI, Márta. 2022. “Fleance and Obscured Scottish Futures in Screen Adaptations of Macbeth by Goold, Kurzel and Coen.” Special Issue Continuity and Change in Screen Shakespeare(s), ed. Sylvaine Bataille and Victoria Bladen. Anglistica AION 26 (2): 27–38. http://www.serena.unina.it/index.php/anglistica-aion/issue/view/788/762 (Last access: July 29, 2025).
––––. 2026 (forthcoming). “Death of Puppets and Puppets of Death in Macbeth (directed by Rémusz Szikszai, 2018, Jászai Mari Theatre Tatabánya and Szkéné Theatre Budapest, Hungary.” Theatralia: Journal of Theatre Studies 2026 (2).
HENSEL, Andrea. 2017. “Independent Theatre in the Post-Socialist Countries of Eastern Europe: New Forms of Production and Creativity in Theatre Aesthetics.” In Independent Theatre in Contemporary Europe: Structures – Aesthetics – Cultural Policy, ed. Manfred Brauneck and ITI Germany. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1xxssd (Last access: July 29, 2025).
JAKOBSON, Roman. 1975. Puskin and His Sculptural Myth. Transl. and ed. by John Burbank. Paris: Mouton.
KISS, Attila. 2013. “Macbeth as a Tragedy of Consciousness on the Hungarian Stage after 1989.” In The Shakespearean International Yearbook, vol. 13, Special Section, Macbeth, ed. Tom Bishop, Alexander C. Y. Huang and Stuart Sillars. Farnham: Ashgate.
––––. 2024. Kettős Anatómia Shakespeare Színpadán [Double Anatomy on Shakespeare’s Stage]. Szeged: University of Szeged Press.
LEONARD, Kendra Preston. 2009. “Silencing Ophelia: Male Aurality as a Controlling Element in Olivier’s Hamlet.” Scope 14 (June). https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/scope/documents/2009/june-2009/leonard.pdf (Last access: July 29, 2025).
MARÓY, Krisztina. 2022. “A legfontosabb az lenne, hogy egyenlően hozzáférhessünk a javakhoz és a tudáshoz [It would be imperative to have equal access to goods and knowledge]. Interview with actress Lídia Danis.” Glamour, September 5. https://www.glamour.hu/monitor/danis-lidia-szineszno-glamour-oktober/y70xzp8) (Last access: July 29, 2025).
MASON, Pamela and Sandra Clark. 2015. Macbeth. Ed. London: Bloomsbury.
MOORE, Barrington, Jr. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
MORI, Masahiro. 2012. “The Uncanny Valley.” Transl. Karl F. MacDorman and Norri Kageki. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19 (2): 98–100. Original text in Japanese (1970): “Bukimi no tani.” [The Uncanny Valley]. Energy 7 (4): 33–5.
OPENAI. ChatGPT. September 11, 2025. https://chat.openai.com/. GPT-5 (free version).
PIKLI, Natália. 2020. “Hybrid Creatures in Context: Centaurs, Hobby-horses and Sexualised Women (Hamlet, King Lear, The Two Noble Kinsmen).” In Shakespeare et le monde animal / Shakespeare and the Animal World, ed. Anne-Valérie Dulac and Laetitia Sansonetti. Société Française Shakespeare 38. https://journals.openedition.org/shakespeare/5055 (Last access: 29 July, 2025).
RUITER, David. 2022. “Introduction.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Social Justice, ed. David Ruiter. London: Bloomsbury, 1–21.
SHAKESPEARE, William. 1997. Macbeth. Ed. Albert R. Braunmuller. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
––––. 2005. King Lear. Ed. Jay L. Halio. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
––––. 2015. Macbeth. Ed. Sandra Clark and Pamela Mason. London: Bloomsbury.
SPIVAK, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard: Harvard UP.
SPOTO, Stephanie Irene. 2010. “Jacobean Witchcraft and Feminine Power.” Pacific Coast Philology 45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41413521 (Last access: November 20, 2025).
SZABÓ, Anna T. 2004. Shakespeare’s Sonnet 129. Transl. https://www.holmi.org/2004/10/william-shakespeare-negy-szonett-szabo-t-anna-forditasai (Last access: November 20, 2025).
SZABÓ, Lőrinc. 1921. Shakespeare’s Sonnet 129. Transl. https://mek.oszk.hu/00400/00494/00494.htm (Last access: November 20, 2025).
SZIKSZAI, Rémusz, dir. Macbeth. 2018. Stage adaptation. Jászai Mari Theatre, Tatabánya and Szkéné Theatre, Budapest, Hungary.
TANEJA, Preti. 2022. “King Lear and Gender Justice in India.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Social Justice, ed. David Ruiter. London: Bloomsbury, 160–74.
THOMPSON, Ayanna and Laura Turchi. 2022. “Active Shakespeare: A Social Justice Framework.” In The Arden Research Handbook of Shakespeare and Social Justice, ed. David Ruiter. London: Bloomsbury, 47–59.
WILLIAMS, Christy. 2006. “The Silent Struggle: Autonomy for the Maiden Who Seeks Her Brothers.” The Comparatist 30 (May): 81–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26237126 (Last access: July 29, 2025).

